|
|
Post by PhOeNiX on Apr 19, 2006 12:36:48 GMT -5
I hate wolverine hes so worthless i mean the x-men are fine without him
|
|
|
|
Post by ~DARK PhO€NIX D€STINY~ on Apr 19, 2006 16:45:01 GMT -5
I hate wolverine hes so worthless i mean the x-men are fine without him I totally second that to a degree! I've always disliked his storyarcs and the fact that they put him as a star in every marvel comic onnoys me. |
|
|
|
Post by PhOeNiX on Apr 19, 2006 17:11:44 GMT -5
I hate wolverine hes so worthless i mean the x-men are fine without him I totally second that to a degree! I've always disliked his storyarcs and the fact that they put him as a star in every marvel comic onnoys me. I second your opinion to i mean not only is he worthless but he has an ego the size of alkali lake i mean he always thinks evrything is about him like in x1 it was about rouge not u hun so sry in x-2 its about cerebro and jean not u hon sry and now hes probably gonna think its up to him to save everyone hello in case u havent noticed wolveirne ur no better than nightcrawler u suck i mean ur worthless and i hate bryan singer for giving him such a big role and i hate brett to for giving him such a big role in this movie to. |
|
|
|
Post by mutie on Apr 20, 2006 11:34:07 GMT -5
personally I have no problem with the current director, I haven't seen the film yet so I can't say if he did it well or not, as far as i am aware he didn't wright the screen play so the story lines are hardly his doing.
What I have seen in adverts and trailers so far has made it look like it is going to be far superior to the last 2 films in terms of action and effects, so I will stick with the Director we have now until I have seen the film myself.
It just might be amazing!
|
|
|
|
Post by theory1relitve on Apr 23, 2006 14:24:00 GMT -5
Christopher Nolan would have done a fine job!
|
|
|
|
Post by Gambit Aces High on Apr 23, 2006 16:49:23 GMT -5
I think they should have handed X-3 over to Kevin Smith. He has been around comics all his life and could have done them justice.
|
|
|
|
Post by spike6414 on May 6, 2006 2:24:11 GMT -5
If anybody knows anything of triologies it would be peter jackson. I voted for other and it was him who i voted for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Storm-EXed on May 6, 2006 11:35:54 GMT -5
Peter Jackson or Spielgberg woulda suited me....but im happy with Ratner
|
|
|
|
Post by spike6414 on May 6, 2006 22:47:01 GMT -5
Oh yeah Speilberg would have been good also.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gynxsta on May 7, 2006 8:59:23 GMT -5
Hmmm... I wont answer until I see the film. lol But if Singer is on board for X4 and *if* Rogue does get cured in X3... I'd expect her to get her powers back... Singer's in love with the Rogue he created, no doubt we'll see something happen there...
|
|
Bloodstorm
Mutant
"Yeah i know, But are you ready to do what you need to do when the time comes?"
Posts: 185
|
Post by Bloodstorm on May 9, 2006 17:26:18 GMT -5
BRETT RATNER ALL THE WAY FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by MistyStormKnight on May 9, 2006 20:30:04 GMT -5
I would be the best director! All Storm and the X-Geeks in probably one shot bring her water or something.. Am I kidding? Yes, yes I am. I am undecided.  |
|
jas
Newbie
Posts: 4
|
Post by jas on May 11, 2006 10:42:32 GMT -5
We don't know that Ratner's going to screw up the movie. I think the same director for all X-Men movies would be best, but I won't judge the movie til I've seen it.
|
|
midnighterdes8
Human
bordom taints the mind(or so i've heard)
Posts: 76
|
Post by midnighterdes8 on Sept 4, 2006 14:37:27 GMT -5
I think Bryan Singer would be the best. now after seeing X-3 it's easy 2 see the atleast he would have used the firey bird effct at least once unlike Ratner! And the hole movie woldn't be adout Logan, but in fact Jean,Scott,and probly Rogue chousing to ditch the Cure and chetting Bobby! Wich is how it should be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Psylocke 4 ever on Sept 9, 2006 20:39:09 GMT -5
i'd say peter jackson or spielberg
|
|
