|
|
Post by Downhere on Nov 1, 2006 9:05:38 GMT -5
Magneto is awesome and always will be!  |
|
|
|
Post by *FroZen~AL* on Nov 1, 2006 13:52:44 GMT -5
There's nothing wrong with Magneto - i have respect for this character as he is not the villain i thought to be - perhaps in a trilogy it is best we shd see more nemesis besides Magneto and the brotherhood all the time.... wouldnt it be great if future X-movies features more villians like Apocalypse, Mr. Sinister, etc...?
|
|
|
|
Post by Downhere on Nov 3, 2006 4:31:20 GMT -5
You are right, but I would miss the coolness of Mags.
|
|
|
|
Post by perfectstormx on Nov 3, 2006 16:30:31 GMT -5
well IF there be an X4.
|
|
|
|
Post by Downhere on Nov 3, 2006 16:47:05 GMT -5
IF is the key word right there. lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by perfectstormx on Nov 3, 2006 16:49:19 GMT -5
there better be if not im coming after you. hahahaha!
|
|
|
|
Post by xfan6 on Nov 3, 2006 19:12:42 GMT -5
Yes, fox has realy made a lot of money off of the X-men films, but stil hasnt given fans what we want to see, I know that it would be quite awhile before they ever get a budget like star wars, but it should come close all three movies in this trilogy were success, And the budget rumored for X3 was in the range of the last King Kong Flick which was visually impressive, X3 was ok but The effects in King Kong were much better. I think the cast is to large... X3 had a bigger than star wars. i'm pretty sure. |
|
|
|
Post by Downhere on Nov 4, 2006 5:04:15 GMT -5
Yeah, X3 had a bigger budget than Starwars but considering Lucas owns ILM, I'm sure he got a discount because of that. If it were any other director, Starwars would have cost way more than it did.
|
|
|
|
Post by havoc2c on Nov 4, 2006 7:52:43 GMT -5
Wow then he got a major discount, while X-men gets ripped off (now I hate star wars)
|
|
|
|
Post by Downhere on Nov 4, 2006 16:01:32 GMT -5
Well, Lucas owns ILM...what do you expect. lol. X-Men did not get ripped off. Fox rushed it and it cost more money to do things in a short time span. Fox is to blame. Fox should have started production way earlier than it did.
|
|
|
|
Post by perfectstormx on Nov 4, 2006 16:03:39 GMT -5
Yea, the people at the Hype! are complaining that it's all Ratner's fault and i tell them Fox, and sure they hate Fox but still i get yelled at for saying it! boo hiss!
|
|
|
|
Post by Phoenix~Gal on Nov 4, 2006 16:09:14 GMT -5
Lol. I think its FOX fault. But ratner did screw up a couple things cough*phoenix*cough
|
|
|
|
Post by *FroZen~AL* on Nov 5, 2006 7:04:53 GMT -5
Yeah, i agree, it is not only Phoenix's short moment and few lines, even Angel, Rogue and Kitty's screentime is halved alot... it seems to me that their appearances are only cameos, and not part of the main cast, which sux.
|
|
|
|
Post by xfan6 on Nov 5, 2006 23:30:03 GMT -5
i think it is originally fox's, fault, but it kinda had a domino effect. After all, if fox hadn't screwed things up and started when it was supposed to, Ratner wouldn't have even been there to screw/not screw it up!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by *FroZen~AL* on Nov 6, 2006 9:31:51 GMT -5
Yes it is after all a domino effect, FOX was in such a hurry to produce X3 in May 2005, where they shd have waited at least a year later to make sure it is a blockbuster hit... it is afterall the final chapter of a trilogy so they shd have handled with care, and waited for Singer to finish his project with Superman Returns and then direct X3 instead, whikch i believe the whole outcome would have been much different if Singer would've directed instead.
But nooo, FOX didnt want to wait for Singer, and they decide to get Matthew Vaughn to direct in order to meet the May 2005 deadline, which he felt it was impossible to achieve, then they decide to get a director with no sense of storyline and character development, but only action action action (think Red Dragon and Rush Hour movies) how could anyone take that seriously? It doesn tmake Ratner anymore serious director than Singer, cos Ratner's X3 can never match up to Singer's midas touch on the 1st 2 films fer sure! Period!
|
|
|
|
Post by perfectstormx on Nov 11, 2006 20:35:48 GMT -5
Yeah, i agree, it is not only Phoenix's short moment and few lines, even Angel, Rogue and Kitty's screentime is halved alot... it seems to me that their appearances are only cameos, and not part of the main cast, which sux. well i would't call Phoenix's short moments..she had a lot of good moments. lol |
|
|
|
Post by *FroZen~AL* on Nov 13, 2006 8:49:24 GMT -5
Yes she has moments but very quiet moments, not many speaking moments....  |
|
|
|
Post by windsurfer8290 on Nov 21, 2006 15:22:09 GMT -5
that is so true she didnt talk much at all
|
|
|
|
Post by xfan6 on Dec 3, 2006 21:07:07 GMT -5
 i was hoping x3 would stay in the top 5 for worldwide grosses of 2006, and i thought eragon was the biggest threat...but it turns out that Casino Royale is tracking to go over 500 million, kicking x3 out of it's spot and giving it to cars. RAR! they better make x4!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Downhere on Dec 4, 2006 21:20:55 GMT -5
Well, Casino Royale was one of the best movies of the year and at least it's a worthy film to move X3 off the top 5.
Does anyone think that we need an X4 like as soon as possible? lol.
|
|
i was hoping x3 would stay in the top 5 for worldwide grosses of 2006, and i thought eragon was the biggest threat...but it turns out that Casino Royale is tracking to go over 500 million, kicking x3 out of it's spot and giving it to cars. RAR!